i was wondering if tenants should work differently and be more transparent to the user by allowing to swotch the osgi properties per tenant. this would allow for a more transparent implementation without forcing the developer to think about tenants that much.
Ruben On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:14 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > SLING-2710 [1] proposes the addition of a TenantManager service interface. > Thanks for the comments so far. > > One question that came up in the issue is whether the TenantManager should > extend the TenantProvider or not. > > I am a bit undecided: On the one hand I think that the TenantManager is not a > TenantProvider. Also by not extending the TenantProvider the implementation > has more freedom and it forces proper access to the service. > > On the other hand, for administrative tools really using the TenantManager > having it extend the TenantProvider might make the code simpler (only one > service to get instead of two). > > WDYT ? > > Regards > Felix > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2710
