Hi Carsten, On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > ...Now Mike has started work and immediately everyone and his dog is > going back to the old discussion. :(...
So far, between SLING-2698 and this thread AFAICS you're the only one who doesn't want the ResourceResolverDecorator option (which can also be disabled by a default configuration if we want to make it clear that it's not meant for general use). In SLING-2698 Mike indicates he's open to both options, and everybody in this thread seems to prefer it as well. Unless we get more points in favor of the ResourceAccessGate option, the easiest way to go forward seems to be for you to accept that emerging consensus. Or start a vote if we cannot reach consensus in this way. Or come up with another suggestion that allows the access gate to be clearly isolated as an optional feature (a la path-based-rtp) instead of being mixed up with the Sling core. -Bertrand
