> Just to throw in some more ideas :) what about a decorator for > resource providers? This would also solve the use case of easily > adding additional checks to resource providers who don't have their > own access checks without needing to code this into each and every > provider. > > And a ResourceProviderDecorator would work for me much better than a > ResourceResolverDecorator :)
A ResourceProviderDecorator couldn't do the job, because some operations are on the ResourceResolver at the moment (delete, create but also findResources and queryResources). Best regards mike
