On 07.03.2013, at 11:40, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Decorating a resource provider is not as trivial as decorating a > resource because a provider might come in different flavours
Wait - I misunderstood your proposal in the other thread. I thought this would still decorate Resources, but only for a single resource provider, and not for the entire resource tree. What I mean really sounds like a wrapping ResourceProvider to me, which would be even simpler (no additional interface), but I thought there might be little simplicity advantages with such an additional decorator, hence I thought that might be a good compromise. Cheers, Alex
