I don't know if it *excels* at it, but yeah, that was the original idea
behind the launchpad plugin :)



On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>wrote:

> Right.
>
> Isn't that what the launchpad plugin with the bundle list excells at ? ;-)
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 14.03.2013 um 07:12 schrieb Ian Boston:
>
> > Hi
> > Why not have a separate launchpad. Pom that extends the current sling jr
> one, excludes the jr bundles and adds the oak bundles.
> >
> > This is what Sakai did for years when building its variant of Sling with
> its own custom repository. We had a lot of additional bundles and the only
> pain point was when something critical changed upstream.
> >
> > (Well... to be absolutely honest, that wasn't the only pain point;), we
> also hacked jackrabbit internals which was a bad idea.)
> >
> > The Pom for the modified standalone image was minimal.
> >
> > Or would that create too many poms to maintain?
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 14/03/2013, at 6:48, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Great idea to have a launchpad with Oak and run the tests.
> >>
> >> I dont care whether we create a single launchpad by using run modes or
> >> use different ones and profiles etc. If we have more than one
> >> launchpad we need to maintain both, we sometimes already fail to
> >> maintain our single one correctly :) So I would go whatever works
> >> best.
> >> If we create a single launchpad, we definitely wouldn't release this
> >> with Oak included for now and comment the Oak bundles out.
> >>
> >> Carsten
> >>
> >> 2013/3/13 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Am 13.03.2013 um 18:30 schrieb Michael Dürig:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13.3.13 10:27, Antonio Sanso wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Felix
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Me thinks that we need support to run Oak in Sling (or in an OSGi
> framework for that matter). I would prefer for the Oak/Jackrabbit project
> to come with an OSGi bundling of Oak. But I am fine if Sling would do the
> bundling itself if we have to. (We could also do the bundling upfront and
> donate the mechanics to the Oak/Jackrabbit project later).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think this already done in OAK.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes. See the oak-sling module:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-sling
> >>>
> >>> Excellent !! Is that Sling specific in that it implements the
> SlingRepository ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Felix
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We might want to setup a new Builder project which bundles Oak
> instead of Jackrabbit. But I don't think we should have a builder which
> bundles both.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Antonio
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 12.03.2013 um 17:55 schrieb Antonio Sanso (JIRA):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Antonio Sanso created SLING-2788:
> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>          Summary: Sling running using Apache OAK
> >>>>>>>              Key: SLING-2788
> >>>>>>>              URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2788
> >>>>>>>          Project: Sling
> >>>>>>>       Issue Type: Wish
> >>>>>>>       Components: General
> >>>>>>>         Reporter: Antonio Sanso
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It would be nice to have a runMode of Sling that runs on top of
> Apache OAK [0]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [0] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >>>>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> >>>>>>> For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carsten Ziegeler
> >> [email protected]
>
>
> --
> Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | Adobe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to