You mentioned two methods, one with an exact same signature as
ResourceResolver#create - I was refering to that one.
The other one with the additional RT argument is clear, however I think we
can go without it for now.

Carsten


2013/5/10 Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]>

> On 10.05.2013, at 07:29, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think so, the signature of the ResourceResolver#create method is
> > already: create(Resource parent, String name, Map<String, Object> props),
> > so what should a generic method in ResourceUtil do in addition?
>
> Set the resource type.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to