While these are similar concerns, they are different - the symlink stuff
(yes, I use the shorter name) creates a new tree based on an existing one
and this can be overwritten/changed.
The merging approach merges two (or more resources) into a single one -
again using a new sub tree.

Not quiet the same - but we might be able to share code / functionality

Carsten


2013/9/27 Julian Sedding <[email protected]>

> Hi Betrand
>
> Agreed. I took a quick glimpse at the code for SLING-2986. My
> impression is, that the two contributions should be largely
> complementary.
>
> The focus of SLING-1778 is currently about "mounting" existing
> resource (sub-)trees to arbitrary locations in the resource tree. The
> merging aspect is currently on per-node granularity (IIRC). In
> SLING-2986, the merging aspect seems to have been the main focus (e.g.
> sling:hideProperties etc.).
>
> Regards
> Julian
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With SLING-1778 and SLING-2986 we have two contributions that allow
> > for partial merging/shadowing of resources.
> >
> > I haven't looked at the code in detail yet but it looks like a single
> > extension should cover both use cases.
> >
> > IIUC, both are about about taking into account another resource B when
> > looking at resource A, and using B as a default tree for A, optionally
> > overridable.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > (let's discuss the name of that feature in a separate thread once we
> > agree on how to tackle it)
> >
> > -Bertrand
>



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to