[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13800594#comment-13800594
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-3107:
----------------------------------------

[~asavory] - I can't apply this patch:

{code}
$ patch -p0 < SLING-3107.diff 
patching file 
tooling/maven/archetypes/initial-content/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/archetype-metadata.xml
patching file 
tooling/maven/archetypes/initial-content/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/archetype.xml
can't find file to patch at input line 47
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: 
tooling/maven/archetypes/initial-content/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/resources/SLING-CONTENT/apps/html.esp
|===================================================================
|--- 
tooling/maven/archetypes/initial-content/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/resources/SLING-CONTENT/apps/html.esp
     (revision 1522061)
|+++ 
tooling/maven/archetypes/initial-content/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src/main/resources/SLING-CONTENT/apps/html.esp
     (working copy)
{code}

Am I doing something wrong?

> initial-content archetype does not reflect current practices
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-3107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3107
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Maven Plugins and Archetypes
>    Affects Versions: Initial Content Archetype 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Andrew Savory
>            Assignee: Robert Munteanu
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SLING-3107.diff
>
>
> The initial content archetype has a number of deficiencies:
> - it uses xml rather than the more modern json format for content
> - the layout of initial projects doesn't match the most recent sample apps



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to