Hi Am 20.12.2013 um 11:15 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> ...Since this is a radical approach, we can have both approaches sit side by >> side >> and support both. If the new one is used, performance might be better. If >> the old >> one is still use, it still works... > > How would you handle the case where old and new i18n data is present? > I'd suggest handling that per language: if a file is present, node > entries of the same language are ignored, with suitable log warnings > if such ignored data is present. For example, yes. > >> ...Then we can offer a web console plugin to ask the bundle migrate the old >> structure to the new structure... > > Which could mean converting i18n nodes to files data, and move the > i18n nodes to an archive location if successful? Sounds good to me. Exactly — or actually just removing the old nodes (might be "configurable") Regards Felix
