+1 That would be more consistent. Best regards mike
> -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Reconsidering when to apply resource access security > > Hi, > > after long discussions we have to the compromise to tag a resource provider > if a (optionally) available resource access security is used for this > provider. > > I think this was a wrong compromise with no real value - and we should > remove this additional flag and simply always apply the checks. > One main driver is the new feature flags implementation which requires the > additional checks for all providers to properly work - and it would be a > maintenance nightmare to enable the flag on all providers (default is off). > > So, if no one complains with a good reason I'll do the change > > Thanks > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected]
