[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904055#comment-13904055
 ] 

Ian Boston commented on SLING-3398:
-----------------------------------

The benchmarks are very RDBMS focused, with high levels of concurrency and high 
levels or write on some of the tests.
{code}
The request handler will be exercised at 256, 1024, 4096, and 16,384 
concurrency.
{code}

Some of the datasets expected to exist at 1 level (based on the URIs) within 
the repository are large (10K entities).

Being RDBMS focused the review of any implementation may not get a "realistic" 
flag if the reviewers are not aware of how Sling/JCR operates, although I 
notice some published implementations have only chosen to implement 1 or 2 
tests (eg jetty).

Its is encouraging to see that plain old raw servlets running on Resin with 
appears in top 10 or 20 on every list, something I was not expecting given the 
hype surrounding so many cooler frameworks these days.

> Implement techempower.com benchmarks for Sling
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-3398
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3398
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: General
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>              Labels: gsoc2014
>
> TechEmpore provides a benchmark framework for Web Application frameworks to 
> compare their performance. See http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/
> We should implement these benchmarks for Sling to see where Sling stands in 
> this comparison. It would be great if we could contribute the Sling 
> benchmarks to TechEmpower to include it in their comparison chart.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to