Before I close the vote tomorrow, I just want to state that I will ignore the non binding -1 from Alex as the discussions he's referring cover additional functionality which we can add in a next release.
2014-03-06 8:29 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>: > This release is to get out the bug fixes, we're still in discussion of > your suggestions and can simply do a 1.2 release once that's done > > > 2014-03-06 0:31 GMT+01:00 Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]>: > > On 05.03.2014, at 09:13, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > I'm not convinced by the ResourceMergerService API, reading it and its >> > javadoc does not give me a clear picture of where and how to use it. I >> > wouldn't be surprised if we have to change it later on. >> >> -1 (non binding) >> >> While the discussion of the API is still ongoing, and because I would >> expect a major change to the service API (to have it work as originally >> designed and proposed), I'd hold off a release for now. >> >> Oh, it's already about 1.1.... so 1.0 is already out. Well :) >> >> Cheers, >> Alex >> >> >> > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected] > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
