On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > 2014-09-27 13:23 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: >> ...is the common model able to represent such dependencies >> between subsystems/features? >> > Not directly right now, the question is what is missing? A feature can > define configurations, these can be special configurations (starting with a > colon) and we could use this to specify the information...
Might be cleaner to have a dedicated "requires" attribute on the instance model's features? Also makes me thing that Sling features should have maven coordinates, a unique name and a version? -Bertrand
