Hi > Am 04.12.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > On Thursday, December 4, 2014, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> @RequiresAdapter(adaptable=Resource.class, adapter=MyClass.class) >> ... > > This looks good to me, although it would be even more obvious as > > @RequiresAdapter(from=Resource.class, to=MyClass.class) > > The adaptable/adapter terminology has never been intuitive to me, for some > reason.
It is not 100% intuitive, right, unfortunately. But I would refrain from adding not terminology to some existing stuff. We have adaptable and adapter and we should stick. BTW: I may have missed sending message to the list. I have played with this idea an created https://reviews.apache.org/r/28758/ (I call it AdapterReference, though :-) ) Regards Felix
