Am 13.01.15 um 15:36 schrieb Radu Cotescu:
> Hi,
> 
> We could do this, but in this case I'd suggest to go for something like:
> 
> T getValueForProperty(String propertyName) instead of T get(String name)
> 
> Set<String> getPropertyNames() instead of Set<String> properties()
> 
> WDYT?

Yes get() doesn't look nice either :) I would go for getValue() but
getValueForProperty is fine as well

Carsten

> 
> Radu
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Can we at least rename the properties() method to getPropertyNames()
>>
>> Carsten
>>
>> Am 12.01.15 um 18:55 schrieb Radu Cotescu:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Record interface is more complex. Besides being used in the JS Use
>>> Provider code for injecting global objects to the current bindings, the
>>> interface is also used to allow Sightly templates (defined through
>>> data-sly-template) to contain other templates (imbricated
>> data-sly-template
>>> block elements).
>>>
>>> Since Sightly templates are loaded through the Use API (e.g. <div
>>> data-sly-use.tmplLibrary="/apps/myproj/components/templates.html">...),
>>> templates become objects in a Sightly script. Templates embedded in
>> another
>>> template become properties of the main template object. The Record
>>> interface provides this flexibility.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Radu
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> Carsten started to review the Sightly Engine API in SLING-4275 [1].
>> Since
>>>> this issue covers 4 topics, I think it would be best to quickly discuss
>>>> these topic in separate threads.
>>>>
>>>> #3 Record Interface
>>>>
>>>> The Record interface is used primarily by the Java POJO UseProvider to
>>>> inject properties back into the Sightly template bindings: If the object
>>>> loaded by the provider happens to implement the Record interface, the
>>>> respective properties are injected into the current bindings.
>>>>
>>>> The Question is whether this interface is specific to the Java POJO
>>>> UseProvider or not ?
>>>>
>>>> If it is specific, it should probably be moved into a pojo sub package.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4275
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>> [email protected]
>>
> 


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
[email protected]

Reply via email to