On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. This looks more safer and less disrupting as reading the property > is cheaper. > But we'd need a mixin, as scripts are usually nt:file nodes. Right?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. This looks more safer and less disrupting as reading the property > is cheaper. > But we'd need a mixin, as scripts are usually nt:file nodes. Right?