Hi, On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > By analogy with > http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/ReferenceNamespaces, should we > agree on a prefix such as "org.apache.sling.capability.MMM" for our > capability names, where MMM is the module name like "sightly"?
I don't see why not, it's good to namespace them. I would be slightly inclined to drop the 'capability' from the prefix, since it would look a bit rendundant. Compare Require-Capability: org.apache.sling.capability.sightly; filter:="(version=1.0)" with Require-Capability: org.apache.sling.sightly; filter:="(version=1.0)" Cheers, Robert
