Am 23.02.15 um 16:06 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:46 AM, David Bosschaert > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ...what we want here >> as far as I understand is a model where a DS component only exist if >> it's its mapping is available. For this purpose service dependencies >> are the only option AFAICS.... > > It looks like we all agree with this in this thread. > > Felix seemed to have issues with that in its "Please, reconsider this > ServiceUserMapping service" comment in SLING-4312. > For the service that is registered, we don't need to set the bundle symbolic name as a service reg property, the sub system name is sufficient as everything else is taken care by the hooks. In general, I don't think that this is a problem as the same information is freely available as a configuration. Therefore adding the service does not make more info available as already is. It's just a different distribution of the same info
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland [email protected]
