I agree with Robert here, but it might be worthwhile to open an issue with LEGAL. At minimum, that would get the question and answer documented.
Justin On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Sandro Boehme <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > yeah, that sounds good. > Yes, with the Frontend Maven Plugin I declare to use Node.js and npm. I > don't check it in. > The question now is just how to make sure everything is fine from the > legal perspective. It would be good if either someone from the Sling PMC > could say that it's fine the way I proposed to do it or I would like to > make sure that it's fine to open a legal issue at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL. > > Best, > > Sandro > > Am 03.03.15 um 11:26 schrieb Robert Munteanu: > > Hi Sandro, >> >> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 22:20 +0100, Sandro Boehme wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> in SLING-4463 [1] I have a question about a license for SLING-4462 [2]. >>> Does someone has an idea on how to handle that or should I open a legal >>> issue [3]? >>> >>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4463 >>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4462 >>> [3] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL >>> >> >> I'm not really familiar with the toolchain you're using so I might be >> mistaken, but as long as the tools are not checked in to source control >> and are not distributed we should be fine. >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> >
