re-updated tarball & shasum with Robert’s issue fix. 

Please vote now :-)

Nicolas
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 21:26, Nicolas Peltier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> updated tarball & shasum, with additional bugfix.
> 
> for your test issue, which version of java are you running? 
> 
>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 18:01, Nicolas Peltier <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Robert, will fix that and update the ticket then :-) 
>> 
>> Nicolas
>>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 17:23, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 15:17 +0000, Nicolas Peltier wrote:
>>>> out of curiosity, can you tell me which one of the tests failed? (it
>>>> doesn’t on mine)
>>> testAdditionalScript(org.apache.sling.pipes.PipeBindingsTest)  Time
>>> elapsed: 0.085 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>>> 
>>> java.lang.AssertionError: computed expression have testSum script's
>>> functionavailable expected: java.lang.Integer<3> but was:
>>> java.lang.Long<3>
>>>      at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>>>      at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743)
>>>      at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
>>>      at
>>> org.apache.sling.pipes.PipeBindingsTest.testAdditionalScript(PipeBindin
>>> gsTest.java:101)
>>> 
>>> BTW, the build previously passed due to my having configured additional
>>> Maven repositories, but does not build with default maven
>>> configurations as it contains references to unavailable artifacts:
>>> 
>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project org.apache.sling.pipes: Could
>>> not resolve dependencies for project
>>> org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.pipes:bundle:0.0.8-SNAPSHOT: Failure
>>> to find org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.api:jar:2.4.3-R1488084 in 
>>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local
>>> repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
>>> interval of central has elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]
>>> 
>>> I therefore withdraw my vote and suggest that you re-attach an archive
>>> with the proper dependencies and restart the test.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Robert
>> 
> 

Reply via email to