On 05/11/15 18:22, "Robert Munteanu" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 17:57 +0100, Stefan Egli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> There was this SIGSEGV happening in the previous run for sling-trunk-
>> 1.7
>> [0].
>> 
>> Just a wild guess if it would be similar to [1]: perhaps the process
>> doesn't have enough java heap too?
>
>That would be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10557 . It
>has no solution though, just complatins :-)
>
>I am not sure that adding more memory will help - I don't think it
>fails on the first GC. Perhaps we can use a more recent Java version?
>
>I see that on Jenkins we have 'JDK 1.7 ( latest )', but 7u25 is
>definitely not latest :-) I have switched to 'OpenJDK 1.7 ( Ubuntu only
>)', let's see if that helps.

Ok cool, let's see.

Cheers,
Stefan

>
>Robert
>
>
>
>> 
>> How can we increase that? (I've seen OOME on jenkins earlier
>> actually, so
>> I think it would be good anyway)
>> 
>> #
>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>> #
>> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xf6814654, pid=1179, tid=2711087936
>> #
>> # JRE version: 7.0_25-b15
>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (23.25-b01 mixed mode linux-x86
>> )
>> # Problematic frame:
>> # C  [libnet.so+0x14654]  _fini+0x1d0c
>> #
>> # Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable
>> core
>> dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
>> #
>> # An error report file with more information is saved as:
>> # 
>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/sling-trunk-
>> 1.7/trunk/bundles/scripti
>> ng/sightly/testing/target/oak-35596/hs_err_pid1179.log
>> #
>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>> #   http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
>> # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
>> # See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
>> #
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Stefan
>> --
>> [0] - https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/2667/console
>> [1] - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21964620/java-7-update-25-cr
>> ash
>> 
>> 
>


Reply via email to