On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Klco <[email protected]> wrote: > If this is a "beta" piece of software I'm not sure we'd need the dependency > yet.
Looks like my use of version as 0.0.2 caused confusion. To clarify this is not a "beta" piece of software. Current feature set done is stable, tested and the api not going to change in incompatible way. Its just that I plan to add some more features to this module before considering it as 1.0. I just treat 1.0 as special but its just me! Reason for current release is to allow use of the API part in other bundles and not hold that work. Further feature work would mostly affect reporting side which would not affect the bundles which make use of the API delivered so far If others think that we should call it v 1.0.0 for it to be included in bundle/commons and launchpad then I can as well cut a new release with 1.0 as version number? Chetan Mehrotra
