[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15126162#comment-15126162
 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-5435:
-----------------------------------------

[~egli] ok yes, maybe marking the listener with a property is better than 
introducing a new event type.
For the API, for now we could simply state that the API only handles one case 
(sync'ed). Adding a new method looks too confusing to me , given the little 
benefit. I don't really expect client code to be based on the API - it's more 
an informative API

> Decouple processes that depend on cluster leader elections from the cluster 
> leader elections.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-5435
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5435
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: General
>            Reporter: Ian Boston
>
> Currently there are many processes in Sling that must complete before a Sling 
> Discovery cluster leader election is declared complete. These processes 
> include things like transferring all Jobs from the old leader to the new 
> leader and waiting for the data to appear visible on the new leader. This 
> introduces an additional overhead to the leader election process which 
> introduces a higher than desirable timeout for elections and heartbeat. This 
> higher than desirable timeout precludes the use of more efficient election 
> and distributed consensus algorithms as implemented in Etcd, Zookeeper or 
> implementations of RAFT.
> If the election could be declared complete leaving individual components to 
> manage their own post election operations (ie decoupling those processes from 
> the election), then faster election or alternative Discovery implementations 
> such as the one implemented on etcd could be used.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to