On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I had a look in the code though, and in the current state I don't dare to > commit anything within mapping classes. The logic is so complex and > convoluted and the namings are confusing which are being used > there. Therefore someone else would need to take that up....
Does this mean that mapping code is not covered by automated tests? If yes you are right that we shouldn't make any non-trivial changes to it, until we have tests for it. -Bertrand
