Indeed, in my case it seem that the OSGi installer was just stuck for some 
reason. After restarting the installer bundle org.apache.sling.installer.core 
<http://dow-qa-publish-1.nhe.netcentric.biz:4503/system/console/bundles/10> 
everything was fine again. I cannot reproduce any longer. But there seems 
definitely something to be fishy when the Installer can reach such a state.
Konrad

> On 24 May 2016, at 13:30, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote
>> Konrad Windszus wrote
>>> Hi,
>>> Currently in case the entity (e.g. bundle or configuration) with the 
>>> highest priority is removed through the OSGi Installer (no matter which 
>>> provider contributed it), the one with the 2nd highest priority will not 
>>> automatically get activated (see 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5744 
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5744>).
>>> This is IMHO a defect which should be fixed.
>>> 
>>> Since the OSGi Installer Impl already maintains a list of processed 
>>> entities from the past it should have all the necessary information to 
>>> automatically try to install the entity with the same ID from another 
>>> location (with the now highest priority) in case the formerly active entity 
>>> was removed. At least for the schemes "launchpad and jcrinstall" this 
>>> should be possible, as that URL contains all relevant information to 
>>> automatically try to install those entities in case an entity with a higher 
>>> priority get removed.
>>> 
>>> If that use case is not supported, this may lead to very problems which are 
>>> hard to debug and fix automatically, because in those cases, the according 
>>> entities have to be explicitly modified to be picked up by the OSGi 
>>> installer.
>>> WDYT?
>> 
>> This sounds like a serious bug to me, I'm pretty sure this worked in the
>> past. I also think that we might have IT tests for this scenario.
>> 
> 
> ConfigPrioritiesTest#testOverrideConfig is testing this scenario unless
> I'm misunderstanding your case.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Carsten
> -- 
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to