Hi, On 26 July 2016 at 13:56, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ian, > > Great that you are willing to commit this! > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote: > > While I understand it makes sense to split the mom-api from something > using > > it, (in this case jobs) scattering the something that uses it and the > > integration tests doesn't make sense.... > > Ok - committing under contrib/commons/mom/examples/jobs works for me > and doesn't imply anything about how we are going to use that. > Ok. I'll probably get to it later today, assuming no one disagrees. > > > ...The code doesn't need/use Sling, JCR or Oak as can be seen from the > > crankstart model [1] used in the Integration tests, as such it could live > > in it's own repo... > > Considering that the Sling community (well at least you and me) is > interested I think it makes sense to have it in Sling for now so that > we can eventually release it. > Ok. If there is no interest, then it should be deleted, and not left in the repo bloating the build. There is no value in having unused code hanging around. Best Regards Ian > > -Bertrand >
