[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15467012#comment-15467012
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SLING-6039:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user stefanseifert opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/sling/pull/166

    SLING-6039 ResourceBuilder: Split up ResourceBuilder and 
ResourceBuilderFactory

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/stefanseifert/sling 
feature/SLING-6039-resourcebuilder-factory

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/sling/pull/166.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #166
    
----
commit 79cce1881d2dd14731711ad187125ca47b368878
Author: sseifert <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-09-06T09:56:09Z

    SLING-6039 ResourceBuilder: Split up ResourceBuilder and 
ResourceBuilderFactory

----


> ResourceBuilder: Split up ResourceBuilder and ResourceBuilderFactory
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-6039
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6039
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Stefan Seifert
>            Assignee: Stefan Seifert
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Resource Builder 1.0.0
>
>
> i do not understand why we combine the use cases
> * resource builder creation
> * resource builder usage
> in one single ResourceBuilder interface, with two implementations each only 
> supporting the one part or another, throwing exception when the other methods 
> are used.
> it think it would be quite cleaner and easier to understand to create a 
> separate ResourceBuilderFactory interface.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to