[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15696246#comment-15696246
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-6327:
----------------------------------------

The reason is that resource resolver in version 1.5.5-SNAPSHOT is used 
(https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/trunk/launchpad/builder/src/main/provisioning/sling.txt#L60)
 but still API in 2.15.0 
(https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/trunk/launchpad/builder/src/main/provisioning/sling.txt#L36).
 
The RR now has a dependency to 2.15.1-SNAPSHOT!
What is the reason why launchpad relies on the latest SNAPSHOT of the resource 
resolver?

> ResourceResolverImpl.isResourceType() should compare relative resource types 
> (and ignore any search path prefixes)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-6327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6327
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ResourceResolver
>    Affects Versions: API 2.15.0, Resource Resolver 1.5.2
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>             Fix For: API 2.15.2, Resource Resolver 1.5.6
>
>         Attachments: SLING-6327-v01.patch
>
>
> Currently the following two expressions return false
> {{ResourceResolverImpl.isResourceType(<Resource with 
> resourceType="sling/some/type">, "/libs/sling/some/type"}}
> {{ResourceResolverImpl.isResourceType(<Resource with 
> resourceType="/libs/sling/some/type">, "sling/some/type"}}
> Since it cannot always be influenced whether the given resource is absolute 
> or relative (because both usually works from a rendering perspective when you 
> talk about the current request's resource), both cases should actually return 
> {{true}}.
> See also the related discussion at 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg62351.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to