On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote: > ...There were no tests which had to be adjusted for the change, but in fact > there is a semantical change...
hmm...hmm...hmm...that vague feeling that the test coverage is not what it should be ;-) Did you add tests that demonstrate the new behavior? -Bertrand
