[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15770607#comment-15770607
]
Timothee Maret commented on SLING-6422:
---------------------------------------
bq. Note that supporting just the generic restriction(name, values) form would
be simpler at the cost of breaking parser compatibility with the existing
nodetypes option.
[~bdelacretaz] by "parser compatibility", do you mean that the existing parser
will need to be adapted to parse the new syntax or that there is a identifier
collision in the syntax itself or something else ?
>From [1] and if we limit to the "generic form for any restriction type" I
>don't see the issue.
> Allow for specifying oak restrictions with repoinit
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-6422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6422
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Repoinit
> Reporter: Nitin Nizhawan
>
> Allow for specifying oak restrictions with repoinit. Currently repoinit
> allows one to ADD remove ACLs but there is no way to specify oak restrictions.
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/authorization/restriction.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
