On Monday 30 January 2017 09:47:45 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> while I agree that it feels a little bit strange release without any
> functional changes, there is nothing wrong with doing this release. As
> you say releasing is cheap.

that depends on how you define cheap. Doing a release takes about 1 hour and 
checking a release at least 20 to 30 minutes per developer (additional time 
for integrating a new release into a product).

Regards,
O.

> Carsten
> 
> Timothee Maret wrote
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 2017-01-27 13:55 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>:
> >> On Thursday 26 January 2017 12:58:34 Stefan Seifert wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>> 
> >>> (although it looks strange that the list of changes contains no
> >> 
> >> functional
> >> 
> >>> change and only an improved unit test coverage)
> >> 
> >> Does improved test coverage really justify a new release?
> > 
> > The motive is a technical one. Indeed, a release is needed for us @ Adobe
> > as we run internal tests on released artefacts.
> > 
> > Generally, I thought that releasing are cheap and thus we could go for it.
> > However, if it does not make sense from Sling POV, I would cancel the
> > release process.
> > Please let me know.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Timothee
> > 
> >> O.
> >> 
> >>> stefan


Reply via email to