[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15891738#comment-15891738
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-6578:
-----------------------------------------
[~kwin] I guess the title of this issue needs to be adjusted
> Use "service.pid" property instead of class name to reference validators
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-6578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6578
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Validation
> Affects Versions: Validation 1.0.0
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Fix For: Validation 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: SLING-6578-v01.patch
>
>
> Leveraging the component's "service.pid" property value instead of its
> classname is more stable (even if implementation changes, the PID might stay
> the same) and also allows for configuration factories to refer to a specific
> validator configuration. The fallback should be the property "component.name"
> as "service.pid" is not always necessarily set. Basically the validator
> should be referable via each of those value, i.e. one of the "service.pid"s
> or the "component.name".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
