[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978858#comment-15978858
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-6785:
---------------------------------------
[~jelger] the problem for me with {{scope="request"}} is that it doesn't make a
lot of sense to use that for the case where the adaptable is a Resource.
Maybe "scope" is the wrong term. "cacheLifecycle"? "bindToLifecycle"?
or just "cache=true" ;)
> Add support for scoped lifecycle of sling models
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-6785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6785
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Christophe Jelger
> Priority: Minor
>
> Similar to the scopes of JEE beans
> (http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/gjbbk.html), it would be nice
> to have the possibility to set a scope for sling models.
> For example, a sling model instance could be reused for all the components
> within the same HTTP request, thus avoiding that multiple instances of the
> "same" model are created.
> This could be an attribute of the {{@model}} annotation, for example
> something like:
> {{@model(scope="request")}}
> The {{request}} scope sounds straightforward for a sling model adapted from a
> request.
> For models adapted from a resource, there are scenarios where the resource
> itself is not relevant once the model has been instantiated, so it would
> still be useful to be able to obtain the same model instance for different
> components and resources within the same HTTP request.
> We could possibly have the same scopes than the JEE beans scope: {{request}},
> {{session}}, and {{application}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
