[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16046600#comment-16046600
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-6422:
--------------------------------------------
[~nitin.nizhawan] the {{sameRestrictions}} method assumes the
{{getRestrictions}} and {{getMVRestrictions}} methods return a sorted list of
values - in the for loop that compares old and new values.
Is that ordering guaranteed? The javadocs [1] do not mention ordering.
If the Value array is not sorted I think you need a more robust comparison.
[1]
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/2.8/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/security/JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.html#getRestrictions(java.lang.String)
> Allow for specifying oak restrictions with repoinit
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-6422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6422
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Repoinit
> Reporter: Nitin Nizhawan
> Attachments: SLING6422ApplyRestrictionsV2.patch,
> SLING6422ApplyRestrictionsV3.patch,
> SLING6422_interpretparsedrestrictionclause.patch, SLING-6422.patch
>
>
> Allow for specifying oak restrictions with repoinit. Currently repoinit
> allows one to ADD remove ACLs but there is no way to specify oak restrictions.
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/authorization/restriction.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
