Ok, forget about this issue here. Actually the Sling Servlet Resolver can deal 
fine even with transitive resource super types. In my case the issue was within 
the 
https://github.com/Adobe-Marketing-Cloud/aem-core-wcm-components/blob/be656c09ea43ea80b37e0727399aa48de3e43c8a/bundles/core/src/main/java/com/adobe/cq/wcm/core/components/internal/servlets/AdaptiveImageServlet.java
 which was throwing a 404.

> On 13. Jun 2017, at 16:51, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Konrad Windszus wrote
>> "Deriving" in this context means: having a sling:resourceSuperType set.
>> So in my example "componenta" has sling:resourceSuperType set to 
>> "core/wcm/components/image/v1/image" and "componentb" has 
>> sling:resourceSuperType set to "componenta".
>> 
> Got it, thanks - I think that should work...has componenta a different
> resource type than componenta? (not sure if this makes a difference though)
> 
> Regards
> Carsten
> 
>>> On 13. Jun 2017, at 16:24, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Konrad Windszus wrote
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Currently if a servlet is registered for a specific resource type, e.g. 
>>>> like the one from 
>>>> https://github.com/Adobe-Marketing-Cloud/aem-core-wcm-components/blob/be656c09ea43ea80b37e0727399aa48de3e43c8a/bundles/core/src/main/java/com/adobe/cq/wcm/core/components/internal/servlets/AdaptiveImageServlet.java
>>>>  it is correctly resolved for a resource with a resource type "componenta" 
>>>>  directly having "core/wcm/components/image" as resource super type. But 
>>>> as soon as an additional inheritance level comes into play, e.g. 
>>>> "componenta" deriving from "core/wcm/components/image" and "componentb" 
>>>> deriving from "componenta" the servlet is no longer being resolved for 
>>>> resources having the resource type "componentb" (and instead a 404 is 
>>>> returned, because no other servlet/script for the according selector is 
>>>> registered). Is that a known limitation of the Servlet Resolver?
>>> 
>>> I'm not quiet sure what you mean with "deriving"?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Carsten
>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Konrad
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland
> [email protected]

Reply via email to