+1 Tommaso
Il giorno ven 15 set 2017 alle ore 12:58 Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> ha scritto: > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 22:40 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Friday 08 September 2017 16:48:24 Stefan Seifert wrote: > > > in our last discussion [1] our plan was this: > > > > > > > > > > - name pattern for the git repository should be something like > > > > "sling-<artifactId>" > > > > - we drop the folder grouping from svn today in > > > > "extensions", "servlets", "commons" etc. only the hierarchy of > > > > artifactId > > > > is relevant. - with the prefix "sling-" they > > > > - question: how are "contrib" and "samples" repos marked? by > > > > another > > > > prefix like "sling-contrib-" and "sling-samples-"? > > > > > > i'm in favor of using the artifactid because it's unique and easy > > > to find. > > > > +1 for artifactId (with prefix sling if really required – we only > > have four > > maintained artifacts without sling) because it's a dead simple > > pattern (for > > automation also). > > Seems that everyone else seem to like the artifact id so we'll go with > that. > > Thanks for the input. > > Robert > > > > > O. > > > > > stefan > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37765304556b17a04e7eb122afd895 > > > ea7beae9 > > > 57d56c9d4501a9f2e0@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:34 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: [git] Naming of git repositories > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've started thinking a bit about the Git migration process. I > > > > don't > > > > think we've discussed naming individual Sling modules after being > > > > extracted from SVN. > > > > > > > > ASF mandates that we use a pattern of 'TLP-module' for the git > > > > repositories, so the modules must be name sling-${something}. > > > > > > > > As for that ${something}, it can be one of > > > > > > > > 1. artifactId / Bundle-SymbolicName > > > > 2. short name ( as currently used in the SVN repo ) > > > > > > > > I would favour option 2, as I think option 1 has too much > > > > redundancy: > > > > > > > > > > > > sling-org.apache.sling.auth.core > > > > > > > > > > > > is too verbose compared to > > > > > > > > > > > > sling-auth-core > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Refining option #2, we should remove some commons prefixes, such > > > > as: > > > > > > > > - bundles > > > > - contrib/bundles > > > > - bundles/extensions > > > > - contrib > > > > - contrib/extensions > > > > - karaf > > > > - tooling/maven > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > >
