No one will ever manually type the clone URLs but always copy from some web page or use the repo manifest. Therefore having it close to the artifact id is good enough. I am fine as well with replacing "." by "-" in the artifact id. Konrad
> On 9. Oct 2017, at 16:25, Stefan Seifert <[email protected]> wrote: > > if the git repo names are still based on artifact id with only "." replaced > by "-" i suppose this would be ok from my side. > we mainly wanted to avoid to choose completely different naming schema which > may be hard to guess if you have only the artifact id of a given bundle. > > stefan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 4:19 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [discuss][git] Repository names cannot contain dots >> >> Hi, >> >> Well, word came back from infra that we can't use dots in the >> repository names [1]. I asked about the reasoning for that but did not >> yet get an answer. >> >> The question is - what do we do now? Do we want to replace dots with >> something else and live with a discrepancy between artifact ids and >> repository names? Do we wait until we have better solution? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert >> >> >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15229?focusedCommentId >> =16197034&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- >> tabpanel#comment-16197034 >
