On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote: > On Monday 09 October 2017 21:57:34 Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > Given that we're going to have a single samples repository, would > > it > > make sense to move the modules from under testing/samples under > > samples/testing? > > > > testing/samples/ > > > > > -- bundle-with-it > > > > `-- module-with-it > > > > I would also rename the artifact ids from > > org.apache.sling.testing.samples.FOO to > > org.apache.sling.samples.testing.FOO . > > can we agree on common group id and package name for samples – at > least for > unreleased and new samples?
I would suggest org.apache.sling.samples . We can also use org.apache.sling.samples.testing for testing samples, but that's optional for me, we can stick with one group id. > Btw, why do we not create one repo per sample? As noted at [1]: "having samples spread over multiple repositories will make it harder for users to discover all of them" Robert [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Move+from+Subver sion+to+Git
