On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 16:04 +0200, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Ian Boston <i...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 11 October 2017 at 11:21, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Ian,
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:47 +0100, Ian Boston wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > Could be me.
>> > > > I do mvn clean install on a clean Sling checkout with a clean
>> > > > maven
>> > > > repo
>> > > > and I get failiures to download slingfeature:9-SNAPSHOT
>> > > > required by
>> > > > an IT
>> > > > test sample. This happens before the reactor starts.
>> > >
>> > > Fixed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1811803&view=revev .
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > If I fix that by using slingfeature:9 I then get 11 test
>> > > > failures in
>> > > > commons.log related to the format of the logging output.
>> > > >
>> > > > Is this just me ?
>> > > >
>> > > > If it is just me, I can disable tests there to move on.
>> > >
>> > > I am not sure anyone is building the full reactor anymore
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Isnt that a bit dangerous ?
>> > Not being able to reliably build Sling could allow a failure to go
>> > for
>> > months without being noticed using old snapshot builds from other
>> > modules.
>> >
>> > I assume no one is building all of Sling because it takes too long
>> > now ?
>>
>>
>> Carsten and I did sit down semi-regularly and got it back building.
>> Not sure when we did that last but it can't be more than a month or
>> two.
>>
>> I agree that this is not a good state to be in.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>
> Would it help if we added weekly builds for all modules, irrespective
> if any changes are present?

Yes, I think that would be a good start. Ultimately, I still think we
should get this "run integration tests with all bundles set to
SNAPSHOT build" working but until we have that we might as well make
sure we run the reactor every once in a while. Would that be hard to
do?

regards,

Karl

> Robert



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com

Reply via email to