Finally I got the right file. Seems that some intermediate cache (maybe some CDN?) still delivered the old version yesterday. Now looks good although https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7403 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7403> is still not fixed. But since this is only a minor issue I am gonna vote for release.
> On 19. Jan 2018, at 08:56, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > > I think you're looking at the wrong file, somehow. > > $ svn up > Updating '.': > At revision 24311. > $ md5sum org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip > 36f4aadc5be250c4ed6654e9a3d17fb0 org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip > $ cat org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip.md5 > 36f4aadc5be250c4ed6654e9a3d17fb0 > > Also, downloading the file results in an archive with the same checksum as > above. > > Robert > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 22:47 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> I just redownloaded https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide- >> tooling-1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip <https://dist.a >> pache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide-tooling- >> 1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip>. Still the same issue >> that the contained /plugins/org.apache.sling.ide.eclipse-ui_1.2.0.jar >> is in fact the core module. >> The md5 for the downloaded zip is 2ffdab4588a047d493c78e5bce8e7f55. >> Am I looking at the right thing? >> >>> On 18. Jan 2018, at 22:33, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:28 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: >>>> Hi Konrad, >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 16:54 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote: >>>>> Something must have gone really wrong. After more closely >>>>> inspecting >>>>> the contents of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/id >>>>> e-to >>>>> ol >>>>> ing-1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip <https://dist >>>>> .apa >>>>> ch >>>>> e.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide-tooling- >>>>> 1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip> it seems that >>>>> the >>>>> contained "org.apache.sling.ide.eclipse-core_1.2.0.jar" >>>>> contains >>>>> the >>>>> plugin.xml from the m2e-ui module. Also the other JARs look >>>>> weird. >>>>> @Robert: Can you check again? >>>> >>>> It seems that the jar contents are correct, but the names are >>>> mixed >>>> up. >>>> I'll look into a fix. >>> >>> I have corrected the signing process and submitted the files with >>> the >>> correct names in the zip file. >>> >>> I am not sure if we should respin the release, given that the >>> artifacts >>> are built from the exact same source code. At any rate, Konrad - >>> can >>> you please retest with the new artifacts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Robert >> >> >
