I guess it's fine upgrading to 4

2018-01-29 13:58 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>:

> On Monday 29 January 2018 11:48:11 Nicolas Peltier wrote:
> > Well there is a dependency cycle: i need a 1.0.0+ paxexam for 2.0.0,
>
> It's just a string for Testing PaxExam and I can do a local 2.0.0 build for
> ITs.
>
> > but
> > yes otherwise i'm ready
>
> Should we support Sling Query 3 and 4 or just upgrade Pipes to 4.0.0?
>
> O.
>
> > 2018-01-29 11:33 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>:
> > > On Monday 29 January 2018 10:41:59 Nicolas Peltier wrote:
> > > > Hey,
> > >
> > > Hi Nicolas,
> > >
> > > > Would like to do a release of pipes that depends
> > > > on org.apache.sling.testing.paxexam 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. What is missing
> for
> > > > that version to be released? Can I help?
> > >
> > > I will do a final versions update including releases under vote and
> > > upcoming
> > > Pipes (so we can include Query 4.0.0) today.
> > >
> > > Are you ready to release Pipes 2.0.0 today?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > O.
> > >
> > > > Nicolas
>
>

Reply via email to