[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16395019#comment-16395019
 ] 

Radu Cotescu commented on SLING-7231:
-------------------------------------

Hello [~Gimo],

Apache Sling has a XSS protection library [0], however it's using OWASP's 
AntiSamy module for filtering HTML. The goal of this issue would be to 
transition the module to use the OWASP HTML Sanitizer Project [1]. However, 
there should be a bridge between these two dependencies, in the sense that the 
Apache Sling XSS Protection API module should still be able to read AntiSamy 
configurations, but apply them to [1], so that customers can upgrade the Apache 
Sling XSS Protection API module in-place, without the need of migrating 
configurations to a new format.

You should be familiar with Java, Maven and Git. XSS mitigation knowledge is 
recommended.

[0] - https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-xss/
[1] - https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_HTML_Sanitizer_Project


> Move to owasp sanitizer library
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-7231
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7231
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: XSS Protection API
>            Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: gsoc2018, java
>             Fix For: XSS Protection API 2.1.0
>
>
> While looking at the extensive dependency list of the XSS module (which are 
> all caused by the embedded owasp.org artifacts), I found out that the 
> versions we use are outdated.
> So I think we should update those to the latest.
> Furthermore, the embedded antisamy library does not look to be maintained 
> anymore
> (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_AntiSamy_Project)
> instead the html sanitizer looks much fresher and claims to be faster
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_HTML_Sanitizer_Project
> I think we should switch. Quick analysis:
> Pros:
>     Actively maintained
>     Much faster
>     Lightweight (also from a dependency POV)
> Cons:
>     Incompatible (and runtime-object based) configuration
>     Not completely feature equivalent (but close enough and better in some 
> aspects)
> Some investigation is needed on how
> a) filter rules can be configured (e.g. sling configurations, file based, 
> code bundle, ... ?)
> b) existing configurations can be migrated 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to