[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16522259#comment-16522259
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-7754:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks Tim, DistributionQueue looks ok at first sight indeed - assuming the
interfaces that it uses are also independent from JCR. You don't need to
explain all the details, I assume you are aware of those issues, I'm fully
ready to trust you folks on this after seeing that API!
> Implement passive DistributionQueue in JCR
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-7754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7754
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Content Distribution
> Reporter: Marius Petria
> Assignee: Marius Petria
> Priority: Major
>
> In order to minimize dependency on Sling Jobs and improve performance we
> should offer an implementation passive queues in JCR.
> Passive queues are distribution queues [1] for which no queue processor is
> defined. They are only used to store items and do not need rebalancing
> between instances. They just need to be stored and fetched (FIFO semantics)
> and this can easily be implemented in JCR with a simpler implementation that
> does not use querying (querying for jobs is problematic like OAK-7495 shows).
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/spi/DistributionQueue.java
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
