[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16580992#comment-16580992
]
Dirk Rudolph commented on SLING-7830:
-------------------------------------
I agree on option 2 being more complex but for me this would be the favoured
one. Lets say we want to run with our blue-green deployment a zero-downtime
strategy where the majority of the users continue working on the green stack
and a subset of samples working on the new blue stack for verification. Having
the master in the blue stack could cause a service interruption for all users
when an issue appears during verification.
> Defined leader switch
> ---------------------
>
> Key: SLING-7830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7830
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Discovery
> Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
> Priority: Major
>
> The current leader selection is based on startup time and sling id (mainly)
> and is stable across changed in the topology for as long as the leader is up
> and running.
> However there are use cases like blue green deployment where new instances
> with a new version are started and taking over the functionality. However
> with the current discovery setup, the leader would still be one of the
> instances with the old version.
> With a new deployed version, tasks currently bound to the leader should run
> on the new version.
> Therefore the leader needs to switch and stay the leader (until it dies).
> We probably need an additional criteria for the leader selection
> /cc [~egli]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
