[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marius Petria resolved SLING-7754.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Content Distribution Core 0.3.6
Thanks [~marett] for the review,
I added some more tests and commited in [1]. The implementation details you
mentioned can be safely postponed.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/commit/6a3670c1cfe1779aff3f9fe9e1b4df04b4e112cd
> Implement passive DistributionQueue in the repository
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-7754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7754
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Content Distribution
> Reporter: Marius Petria
> Assignee: Marius Petria
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Content Distribution Core 0.3.6
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In order to minimize dependency on Sling Jobs and improve performance we
> should offer an implementation passive queues in JCR.
> Passive queues are distribution queues [1] for which no queue processor is
> defined. They are only used to store items and do not need rebalancing
> between instances. They just need to be stored and fetched (FIFO semantics)
> and this can easily be implemented in JCR with a simpler implementation that
> does not use querying (querying for jobs is problematic like OAK-7495 shows).
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/distribution/queue/spi/DistributionQueue.java
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
