Hi Stefan I would prefer c). It sounds cleanest to me.
Regards Julian On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:32 PM Stefan Seifert <sseif...@pro-vision.de> wrote: > > there is a wish to integrate sling models with context-aware configuration to > add a new injector and injector annotation that allows to inject > context-aware configuration typed objects or property values in your sling > models. we have contributions for two approaches, one from the sling models > side [1] and one from the caconfig side [2][3]. > > i'm currently not sure what is the best approach. it is clear that we want to > avoid hard dependency of sling models to caconfig and vice versa. > > there are basically three options: > > a) add support for it in sling models API+impl with an optional dependency to > caconfig API (injector will not be available when caconfig bundles is not > there) > b) add support for it in caconfig API+impl with an optional dependency to > models API > c) create a separate module integrating both, as it is done e.g. for sling > models and sling validation [4], requiring to deploy an additional bundle > > I would prefer a) or c). > > WDYT? > > stefan > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7256 > [2] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-caconfig-api/pull/1 > [3] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-caconfig-impl/pull/1 > [4] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-validation-impl > >
