On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:33 AM Christanto Leonardo <[email protected]> wrote: > ...BTW I rename things to use "type" instead of "model"...
Great! Would it be ok for you to extract the key interfaces into a separate module? I'm thinking of Types, DataType, AttributeDefinition and maybe a few others - just a minimal core that can be used to use the types, without considering how they are actually defined and with ideally no implementation details. My angle is to try to reduce the amount of things on which we need to agree on at this point - I'd then be able to recreate my minimal resource-schemas example based on these APIs, to verify that they provide what I need there, and you could pursue explorations independently on your side. -Bertrand
