I would tend to agree, let's keep things as they are. Thanks,
Robert On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 13:07 +0200, Timothee Maret wrote: > +1 not worth the effort in established projects using Sling IMO. > > Regards, > > Timothee > > > Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 11:59, Julian Sedding <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > I also don't think it's worth the effort. I see no tangible > > benefit, > > but I do see the difficulty this would cause for operational > > aspects > > of existing users. > > > > Regards > > Julian > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:09 AM Stefan Seifert < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > personally i'm not sure if it's really worth to rename the log > > > file. > > > naming it "error.log" is not uncommon in other systems as well, > > > and i > > assume that on most production systems it's not used to log to INFO > > level > > but only for warnings, errors and so on. > > > and the downstream changes required for this are huge - > > > infrastructure > > automation/devops tooling, documentation, training materials and so > > on. > > > stefan > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 10:42 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS][SERIOUS] Rename error.log to sling.log? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > In yesterday's email conversation Roy Teeuwen suggested that we > > > > rename > > > > the error.log file with sling.log or status.log, with multiple > > > > others > > > > supporting the sling.log name. > > > > > > > > I think we should discuss this in more depth. Some information > > > > I > > > > collected from the previous threads: > > > > > > > > - error.log is probably named following the httpd convention > > > > (and uses > > > > many httpd-compatible modifiers/placeholders) > > > > - renaming will negatively impact consumes, e.g. scripts/devops > > > > processes > > > > - for Sling, documentation and (probably) integration tests > > > > should be > > > > updated > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > >
