Maybe a back-burner.. and will be a problem if updating from Java EE 8.

And not just Sling, almost every javax based framework will get affected.

Seems Spring has about 2545 javax imports
[image: Screen Shot 2019-05-08 at 3.22.59 PM.png]


Thanks
Suren

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:04 PM Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:

> IMHO there is one other use case which is javax.activation.PostConstruct (
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7312 <
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7312>) used from Sling Models.
> But I agree with Carsten that we should not think about this yet, as long
> as there is no definite plan what happens to that annotation in the
> future...
>
> Konrad
>
> > On 8. May 2019, at 21:58, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I guess the only hard dependency Sling has is on the servlet API, we
> might use some other javax specs here and there.
> >
> > But, there are no concrete plans yet and I don't think its worth
> speculating. On the other hand, this might only get problematic for Sling
> (or any other project) if a) a an update of a specification is produced
> using the new namespace and b) someone wants to use it in combination with
> Sling (or any other project using the old namespace). Creating new
> specifications and adaption usually takes some time, and we can look at it
> when/if it happens - and maybe it turns out that by that time the answer is
> easy and poses no problems.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> >
> > Suren Konathala wrote
> >> Most of you may have been following the news/updates on the usage
> "javax".
> >> There's lot of discussions and nothing concrete yet. But wanted to know
> how
> >> much of Sling core will be affected and maybe start planning
> proactively?
> >>    - Eclipse foundation announcement
> >>
> https://eclipse-foundation.blog/2019/05/03/jakarta-ee-java-trademarks/
> >>    - Proposals from Eclipse Foundation
> >>    https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg00029.html
> >> Thanks
> >> Suren
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > Adobe Research Switzerland
> > [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to