[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16836447#comment-16836447
 ] 

Karl Pauls commented on SLING-8411:
-----------------------------------

The provided pull request implements this by introducing the concept of a 
RepositoryMount. In short, the base will look for RepositoryMount services 
published with a RepositoryMount.MOUNT_POINTS_KEY service property (for the 
subpaths to take over). While one is present, it will wrap the repositories 
created with a wrapper that will bifurcate requests to the actual repository 
and the mount according to the mount points.

[~cziegeler], does that look good to you?

> Provide a way to bifurcat a repository path to a provider mount
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-8411
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8411
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JCR
>    Affects Versions: JCR Base 3.0.6
>            Reporter: Karl Pauls
>            Assignee: Karl Pauls
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: JCR Base 3.0.8
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While one would normally use a resource provider to extend the content tree, 
> sometimes, that can be not enough a code might make assumptions about the 
> resources being actually being backed by JCR. This can be problematic as for 
> example, a given resource can not necessarily be adapted to a Node nor be 
> found via a Session.
> Hence, a similar approach on the JCR level allowing developers to mount 
> content into sub trees of the repository itself can be helpful to be able to 
> support these kind of usecase. We should provide a hook for a repository 
> mount that takes over a given subpath by wrapping repositories returned by 
> the base and dispatching to the mount when the request is for a given subpath.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to